Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam

Forum for Dialogues on Comprehensive Democracy

Home

For Hindi click here

 

Social Democracy

 

Publications

Notes and Articles

Dialogue Reports

Forthcoming

Back

Rethinking AIDS as Social Responsibility

Asian Social Forum, Hyderabad; 4th January 2003

(Organised by Swasthya Panchayat-Lokayan, Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, ActionAid India)

 

 

 

 

 

Political democracy

Cultural democracy

Ecological democracy

Economic democracy

Gender Democracy

Ideologies & Democracy

Knowledge Democracy

Social democracy

Spiritual Democracy

World-order Democracy

 

Events

Profiles

Useful Links

 

Feedback

Contact us

Dialogues on Strategies for AIDS Control in India/South Asia

Responsibility of the Public Health System towards AIDS

Dr. Alpana Sagar, Assistant Professor, Centre of Social Medicine and Community Health, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi

Abstract

AIDS is a problem that is seen to be linked to larger social and economic problems and issues. Thus an intersectoral approach is needed to deal with AIDS. This takes back us to a wider perspective on health (as embodied in the Alma Ata Declaration of 1978) and so, through AIDS one may realise the potential of primary health care that may take us towards the dream of health for all.

However, in the era of Structural Adjustment Policies and Health Sector Reforms there are cut backs in the social sector including public health services, introduction of user fees and privatisation in the pubilc sector. In the health budget not only have allocations decreased there is a skewing towards investment in AIDS (see graph and table 1). This is reflected in the increasing or stagnating trends in communicable diseases and morality due to them. There have been outbreaks of falciparum malaria in Rajasthan, Nagaland, Manipur and Assam; Kala Azar in Bihar and West Bengal and the plague in Surat. There have been outbreaks of dengue and Japanese Encephalitis as well (Table 2).

Table 1

Allocation for Some Communicable Diseases 2001-2002, 2002-2003

Rupees in crores

 

Disease

2001-2002 (BE/RE)

2002-2003 (BE)

1. Malaria* 173.20/178.15  192.23
2. Kala Azar 12.00/12.00 20.00
3. Filaria 0.26/0.25 0.21
4. Tuberculosis 122.00/100.00  110.00
5. Leprosy 67.00/67.00 82.50
6. NACO* 180.00/199.70 198.00
7. Total 544.46/557.1 602.94

RE=Revised Estimate, BE=Budget Estimate

Source: Expenditure Budget 2001-2002, 2002-2003

* The funds for malaria control are also used for control programme of Japanese Encephalitis and Dengue. The NACO budget does not include all the expenditure on AIDS in the country as it comes through multiple channels.

Pattern of Investment in Communicable Diseases 1990–2003

 

 

Table 2

Time Trends of Some Communicable Diseases in the late 1980s and 1990s

 
    1986 1992 1994 1997 1999 2000  
        Malaria        
  Total Cases Malaria 1.79 million 2.13 million 2.93 million 2.66 million 2.28 million 2 million  
  Total Deaths 323 422 1122 879 1048 (926 verified) 972  
  P. Falciparum cases 0.64 million 0.88 million 0.99 million 1.01 million 1.14 million 1.04 million  
  ABER 9.18 9.59 9.54 10.1 9.31 8.80  
       

Leprosy

       
  Prevalence* 2916000 1673000 9420000 5490000 770000 770000  
  Detection** 477000 517000 494000 425000 528000 518000  
  Mf Rate (%) N/A 1.4 1.2 1.56 N/A N/A  
       

Kala Azar

       
  Cases 17806 77102 N/A 174249 12886 14753  
  Deaths 72 1419 N/A 221 297 150  
 

* Prevalence represents total cases detected.

** Detection represents new cases detected.

       
    1991 1996 1997 1998 1999 2001 (provisional)  
     

Japanese Encyphalitis

     
  Cases 4071 2244 2516 2090 3428 N/A  
  Deaths 1530 592 632 507 680 N/A  
     

Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever

     
  Cases - 16531 1177 707 457 2929  
  Deaths - 545 36 18 4 47  
  Source: Annual Health Reports 1989-1990 to 2001-2002        

 

If the public health sector does not address the urgent medical needs of the people they will stop accessing its services. The implications for AIDS would be devastating because while it may be a vertical programme it still runs through the general health services. Also patients with HIV/AIDS are even more susceptible to other communicable diseases.

Additionally the success of services depends not only on availability and accessibility but also on the attitude of the service providers. If people suffering from AIDS are socially and medically defined as being promiscuous and morally ‘deserving’ of such a disease, they will not come for medical care. The ‘fear phychosis’ generated to change people’s high risk behaviour has built up a paranoid stigma about the disease.

Thus, along with improvement of access and quality of the general health services, one of the first steps towards removing the barriers created by the stigma is through giving sensitive and caring support to those suffering from the disease.

Note: Graph and Tables are from ‘Health’ by Alpana Sagar & Imrana Qadeer, Alternative Economic Survey 2001-2002, Economic ‘Reforms’: Development Denied, Rainbow Publishers, New Delhi.

  Previous

Next

For Hindi click here

     

Copyleft. Any part of the content on this site can be used, reproduced, or distributed freely by anyone, anywhere and by any means. Acknowledgement is appreciated.

Designed and maintained by CAPITAL Creations, New Delhi. Phone 91-11-26194291